Friday, June 30, 2006

What should be the response?

Yesterday, Congressman Newt Gingrich came into to North Carolina to raise money and fired a few shots at Senator Edwards. In the course of the evening, Gingrich challenged Edwards to a debate about poverty. The full newspaper article and details of the debate can be found here.

Personally, I can not believe Gingrich would want to get into another debate. Perhaps, he forgot the way President Clinton embarrassed him during their debate on Medicare. But from his comments, it looks like his whole attack will be an assault on teachers and poor management of schools.

Now, we can all agree some schools that are poorly managed. But many just do not have the funds to educate the students. That is beside the point of why I think Senator Edwards should accept this challenge.

The main reason is that Gingrich will expect Edwards to have the same old liberal tax and spend answers. Edwards’s ideas on minimum wage, matched savings accounts, and college credit are real programs not tired campaign themes.

I would want the debate on CNN or MSNBC. Instead of just a few reporters witness the event, let the nation decide the winner. It would give Senator Edwards the opportunity to show off the leader that he is, and prove he has real solutions to the problems we are facing.

Of course, I am no political strategist. But it is just my personal opinion. What do you think?

2 Comments:

Blogger francois said...

Edwards is a great Democrat with great ideas, but he still isn't comfortable navigating the dangerous waters of challenging the Democratic special interest groups. It's not that Edwards can't beat Gingrich in a debate on poverty. It's that Edwards won't have any effective answers about how to fix public schools. At least on that count, he's only willing to call for more money. That's the teachers' unions' answer.

Edwards won't be a serious Presidential candidate until he combines his great ideas with the political courage to be his own man like Clinton was. Edwards too often dodges the hard questions.

2:34 AM

 
Blogger Luka said...

I disagree. Edwards has taken hard stances. His apology for his vote on the war was a huge gamble. It was an admission of a mistake that is something not seen very often in Presidential politics.

6:00 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home